민주법연의 간행물인 민주법학의 원문을 보실 수 있습니다.
이 게시판은 RSS와 엮인글이 가능합니다.
로그인을 하시면 댓글을 쓰실 수 있습니다..
이 곳의 글은 최근에 변경된 순서로 정렬됩니다.
* 광고성 글은 바로 삭제되며, 민주주의법학연구회의 설립취지에 어긋나는 글은 삭제 또는 다른 게시판으로 이동될 수 있습니다.

공무원의 정치적 중립의무 비판 - 미국 공무원법제와의 비교법적 고찰 / 임재홍

[국문 주제어]

정치적 권리, 중립의무, 해치법

Critical Comment on Political Neutrality of the Public Officials
- Comparative Analysis with the Hatch Act in America -

Lim, Chae-Hong
Professor, Yeungnam Univ.

Members of the Korean Government Employee's Union(KGEU) announced their support for the Democratic Labor Party in the April 15 2004 general election at a press conference in Yoido, Seoul.
A controversy has erupted with the ongoing dispute over the political neutrality of government employees as unionized public servants on Tuesday announced their support for a political party advocating workers󰡑rights. The move by the KGEU conflicts with the Constitutional Court's decision that public servants should remain neutral in politics, as well as with government policy, and thus risks punitive measures being taken against them.
The arrest of the involved public officials came right after the Seoul Central District Court issued an arrest warrant for them, allegedly because they led the union's political engagement ahead of the April 15 elections. The arrest followed a government warning that public employees who were found to have been involved in illegal campaigning would be subject to stern punishment.
'The National Public Officials laws ban public workers from involving in political campaigns, but it doesn't necessarily mean that we can't express our political opinions,' KGEU said in a statement after an emergency meeting.
In a similar case, United States District Court stated, "when the strictures of the Hatch Act and the First Amendment seems to conflict it was the aim of the Congress that the Act be construed in favor of free expression", so "the statutory prohibition against taking an 'active part in political management or in political campaigns' encompasses only active participation in, on behalf of, or in connection with, the organized efforts of political parties, clubs, and candidates"(Blaylock v. Merit System Protection Board, 851 F.2d 1348(11th Cir. 1988) at 1354).
Also in Biller case, the court said, "Finding 'partisan activity' implicitly requires a nexus between the government employee and the effort to promote the political party or elect its candidate(Biller v. Merit System Protection Board, 863 F. 2d 1079(2d Cir. 1988) at 1090).
In October of 1993, legislation which substancially amended the Hatch Act was signed into law. the Hatch Act Amendsments of 1993 permit most federal employees to take an active part in partisan political management and partisan political campaigns. While federal employees are still prohibited from seeking public office in partisan election, most employees are free to work, while off duty, on the partisan campaigns of candidates of their choices.
For more than a half century the idea that public officials should not be involved in a partisan politics has been a fundermental civil service feature. This concept of neutrality was formalized in the Public Officials Acts and the National election Act. An underlying rationale for this idea is that efficiency in government service requires a lack of partisanship in administration.
In my opinion the public officials as private citizen enjoy political rights, therefore their participation in political management and political campaign should be guaranteed.

[Key Words]

Political right,  Political Neutrality, the Hatch Act

List of Articles
번호 제목 날짜 조회 수sort
1122 30호 보험법상 장애인차별에 관한 검토 / 김선광 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 463559
1121 33호 (판례분석) 사립학교법상 임시이사의 정이사 선임권 / 임재홍 (PDF) file 2007-03-23 362069
1120 48호 민주법학 48호 표지 및 목차 file 2012-03-06 194540
1119 34호 (특집) 학교법인 임시이사의 권한 : 상지학원 사건을 중심으로 / 고영남 (PDF) file 2007-09-27 156964
1118 30호 경찰의 일반정보활동에 대한 검토 - 경찰의 정책정보기능 강화론과 관련하여 - / 오병두 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 71115
1117 48호 번역: 프리츠 바우어 그리고 1945년 이후의 나치범죄의 극복 file 2012-03-06 53495
1116 32호 (일반) 법의 세계화 - 조약체결권과 국회동의권의 법적 성격을 중심으로 / 엄순영 (PDF) file 2006-12-31 52520
1115 31호 (일반) 대학교원의 신분보장 - 사립대학교 교원임용제도와 관련하여 - / 임재홍 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 51762
1114 30호 성매매방지법과 여성인권 / 한상희 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 44814
1113 45호 <논문> 김정혜: 장애인준강간죄에서 ‘항거불능’ 요건의 해석에 대한 비판적 고찰 file 2011-03-04 38943
1112 42호 일반: 법적 창의성, 그리고 법학교육 / 이재승 file 2010-03-04 36835
1111 42호 특집: 민주법학과 노동법학 방법론 / 송강직 file 2010-03-04 31662
» 32호 (일반) 공무원의 정치적 중립의무 비판 - 미국 공무원법제와의 비교법적 고찰 / 임재홍 (PDF) file 2006-12-31 30970
1109 30호 전투경찰제도 폐지론 / 송기춘 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 30799
1108 50호 논문: 한국헌법상 경제민주화의 의미 / 노진석 file 2012-11-07 29606
1107 31호 (일반) 개헌사와 평화주의 / 이경주 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 29442
1106 1호 9. 북방정책과 남북교류관계법 file 2004-06-07 28952
1105 31호 (일반) 평택미군기지이전과 관련한 군사시설보호구역지정의 위법성과 일반국민에 대한 군형법 적용의 문제 / 송기춘 (PDF) file 2006-09-03 28824
1104 37호 (특집) 헌법, 국제규범의 관점에서 본 대운하사업 / 이계수(PDF) file 2008-09-06 28617
1103 33호 (일반) 군에 대한 의회통제의 가능성과 한계 - 독일의 ‘국방감독관’ 제도를 중심으로 - / 이계수․오병두 (PDF) file 2007-03-23 28343